Prompt

My friend and I are opening a bubble tea shop in Taipei and pitching it to some family friends who might invest. Can you make a pitch deck for it, 10 slides max? We need about NT$2.5 million to open, rent is NT$80,000 a month, drinks are around NT$65 each, and we want to break even in the first year. Put in a chart that shows when we break even. They’re not finance people, so keep it simple. Call the shop whatever for now. Make it look nice, not like a boring PowerPoint. Make it one HTML file I can open in Chrome and present full screen, with arrow keys to go between slides.

Strengths

The tea brown accent used for highlights throughout the deck works well with the bubble tea theme, as it’s the color of the tea itself and helps emphasize the theme and content of the deck. On the title slide, placing the title and text in the bottom left corner leaves plenty of empty space for the image, which lets the introduction breathe and creates a minimalism that naturally gives the viewer a sense of calm. Setting the title’s Chinese characters large in white feels coherent with that minimalism and strikes the right balance of weight against the subtitle and text around it. The light beige background on slide 2 contrasts well with the busy image on the slide before it, and it pairs well with the tea brown accent. On slide 3, light horizontal lines subtly separate each line of content and add clarity. Slide 5 leaves a lot of space above and below the content, which creates a clear focal point and keeps the slide from feeling cluttered. Its rows also shift from black to grey to tea brown, which is a smart way to create variety and hierarchy, with the most important information in tea brown.

Weaknesses

On the title slide, the title and the text around it sit too close together, which makes them feel cramped and leaves them no room to breathe, hurting their visual impact. The text around the title is also too small. It keeps the slide minimal and leaves ample empty space for a meditative look, but it’s a bit hard to read. The same goes for the whole deck, where the body text is too small on every slide. It’s mostly 16px on a 1920px wide slide, about the size of 8pt text in PowerPoint, and the captions are even smaller. The grey used for those captions also only has a 4.4 to 1 contrast ratio against the beige, which is under the 4.5 to 1 accessibility minimum, so the smallest text in the deck is also the hardest to see.

Slide 2 has way too much empty space below the text, which makes the slide feel unbalanced. That space could be used to make the text bigger and more impactful, or to add visual elements. Its headline also breaks awkwardly and leaves “point.” alone on the second line, and slides 4 and 7 do the same with “sleep on.” and “the black.” Slide 4 is the only slide between the opening and the ending with a full screen photo behind the text, which feels out of place next to the light beige backgrounds of the slides around it. It would be stronger to keep full screen photos for the beginning and end rather than break the consistency midway. The photo also forces a different palette, with light text and dark boxes behind it for legibility, which hurts the minimal approach of the other slides. On slide 5, the labels between the separator lines, where the math is done, sit higher than the numbers beside them, so the spacing above and below is uneven and the rows feel unbalanced.

On slides 6 and 7, the content is clustered at the top and the space below feels empty. It could be used to make the text and charts bigger and clearer while giving them more breathing room. The bars on slide 6 also sit on tracks that run the full width, so they look like progress bars and make “The room” read as 100% complete instead of just the biggest cost. On slide 7, the graph sits too close to its axis, which makes it feel tight and cramped. On slide 8, the content should move down to add weight at the bottom and balance the image fading in at the top. The ending slide’s text is especially small, and as the conclusion it should be bigger to land with more impact.

Issues

On slide 7, the “In the black” label overlaps the line graph, which hurts both polish and clarity. The “Months after opening” label under the graph is also cut off at the bottom, and it sits right up against the numbers above it and the line below it, with no margin.

Deck Rating: 2/5

The deck uses a coherent color palette that matches the theme, and its ample negative space and light type create a meditative mood. However, on slides 2, 6, 7 and 8 the content sits near the top and leaves a lot of empty space at the bottom, so the visual weight feels unbalanced. It also sacrifices clarity for a minimal look by using small text and low contrast captions, and the sudden full screen photo on slide 4 breaks the flow. On top of that come the clipping and overlap issues on slide 7.

Prompt

My friend is opening a small pottery studio in Toronto, on Dundas West near Ossington, and she needs a website before it opens next month. Can you make her a one page site? She runs three classes. Intro to the Wheel is four Tuesday evenings from 7 to 9pm for $240, Friday wheel nights are $45 per person with no experience needed, and Saturday date night is $110 for two people. Clay, glazes and firing are always included. People should be able to pick a class and a date and book a spot. It doesn’t need to take payments yet, she’ll set that up later, so just show that the booking went through. Also answer the questions people always ask, like what to wear, when they get their pieces back (about three weeks after the class), and cancellations (full refund if they cancel at least 48 hours before). She hasn’t picked a name yet, so make one up. Most people will find it on Instagram on their phones, so it has to work well on mobile. Make it feel warm and handmade, not like a template. Make it one HTML file I can open in Chrome.

Strengths

The color palette throughout the website feels coherent with the colors of clay and a pottery studio, which reflects the theme and the feeling well. Subtle separator lines create clear divisions between the content and add hierarchy without being visually distracting. Book a class is set in a filled terracotta button, which makes the main action easy to spot, and on phones it stays pinned in the header, so booking is always one tap away. In the hero, “some clay” is set in italic, which adds visual variety, draws the eye and sets it apart from the text around it. The section below the introduction is separated by a slightly darker background that doesn’t break the flow of the page. The sections have the same spacing above and below them and the margins stay consistent down the page, so it feels balanced and polished. There’s a clear hierarchy between the headings, subheadings and text through font size and color. The Book button under each class jumps straight to the form with that class already picked. When a date is selected it’s highlighted in terracotta orange, which clearly tells the user which date they picked, and the selected class and number of people are highlighted in a darker color as well. The small plus signs in the questions section hint that each question can be opened. The email and Open in maps links are underlined, with the map link also in the accent color, which makes them easy to spot as links.

Weaknesses

On Desktop 1, there’s too much space between the top of the page and the hero text. The text only lines up with the bottom of the photo beside it, which leaves almost 300px of empty space above it while the photo starts just under the header, so the two sides feel unbalanced. On Desktop 2, the small numbers above each point in the darker band only have a 4.2 to 1 contrast ratio against it, which is under the 4.5 to 1 accessibility minimum, and the small labels above each section are only 11px and sit right at 4.5 to 1, so they’re hard to read. On Desktop 3, the note before $240 per person in the first class card is longer than the others and breaks onto a second line, which feels inconsistent with the two cards beside it. The Book buttons under each class are plain outlines and should be subtly highlighted to show they can be clicked.

On Desktop 4, step 4 of the form, Your details, sits only 4px above the Name label while the other steps get 12px, and both use the same small uppercase style, so they run together and feel slightly cluttered. When a date is selected, the small text under it turns light pink on the terracotta and only has a 3.5 to 1 contrast ratio, which makes it hard to read. On Desktop 5, the Hold my spot button stays faded until the name and email are filled in, and nothing tells the user why, so it’s not clear what’s missing.

On Desktop 7, Open in maps feels slightly too small compared to the email above it. The email is 20px in the serif while the map link is 14px, which makes the hierarchy feel off. The two smaller photos in the studio section are repeats, since the class photo from Intro to the Wheel and the hands on the wheel from the booking section both show up again here, which makes the page feel repetitive. The text in the dark footer feels too small at 14px, and there’s too much space around it, which makes the footer feel emptier than it needs to. The email and Instagram links are also spaced further apart than the line below them, which makes the spacing feel inconsistent.

On the phone screens, the menu links disappear and there’s no menu button to replace them, so the only way to get to the questions or the address is to scroll through the whole page. On Phone 3, the summary line in the booking form breaks “Nov” away from “3, 10, 17 & 24”, which splits the date across two lines. Overall, the layout follows a standard landing page template, with the text and photo side by side at the top, three columns of points, three class cards and a list of questions, so even with the warm colors it feels more like a polished template than the handmade look the prompt asked for.

Issues

There are no visible issues. Nothing overlaps or gets cut off.

Website Rating: 3/5

The website does a good job overall with alignment, a coherent palette, and font styles and sizes that create a clear hierarchy and good visual clarity. The main buttons are highlighted, subtle lines and background colors separate the sections without breaking the flow of the page, and the margins and spacing keep it from feeling cluttered. However, some spacing inconsistencies and missing polish, like the plain Book buttons under the classes and the low contrast text in a few places, keep it from a higher score. On phones the missing menu makes the questions and the address harder to reach, and overall the layout feels more like a polished template than the handmade look the prompt asked for.

Prompt

My little cousin is obsessed with bubble tea, so I want to make her a simple game for her birthday. Can you make a game where you move a cup left and right to catch falling tapioca pearls? Each pearl is a point, but if she catches an ice cube she loses a life, and she has three lives. It should slowly get faster the longer she plays. She’ll play on my laptop and on her iPad, so it needs to work with the arrow keys and with touch. Add a start screen, the score while she plays, and a game over screen that shows her best score. Make it cute and fun, not like a boring school game. Make it one HTML file I can open in Chrome.

Strengths

The introduction card on Laptop 1 has soft rounded corners that match the soft and cute theme of the game, and the round, chunky font of the title fits that theme too. The warm palette of tea brown, cream, strawberry pink and mint green feels coherent with bubble tea and reflects the theme well. The Play button is filled in a pinkish red, which clearly signals that it can be clicked. On Laptop 2, the score, lives and buttons sit at the top of the screen and balance the cup at the bottom, and they’re evenly spaced so they don’t distract from it. Their slightly white backgrounds add visual clarity, and they’re small enough to stay out of the way while playing but big enough to find when you look for them. Every pearl caught makes a green +1 pop up above the cup while it smiles, and after five catches in a row it starts counting a combo like +1 x5, which makes catching feel rewarding. On Laptop 3, when an ice cube hits the cup, its eyes turn into small x’s, a light blue tint washes over it and “ice!” pops up beside it, which is a good subtle hint that something went wrong and a life was lost. The game also gets faster and drops more ice cubes the longer you play, which is what the prompt asked for, and it shows clearly on Laptop 4 compared to Laptop 2. The pause screen on Laptop 5 keeps it simple with clear Keep catching and Start over buttons.

Weaknesses

On Laptop 1, the AI generated image of the cup on the introduction card feels unnecessary and lowers the perceived quality of the game before it even starts, because its glossy 3D look doesn’t match the flat drawn cup in the game. The line under the title also breaks awkwardly and leaves “cubes.” alone on the second line. The blue square next to Lose a life is hard to read as an ice cube since it’s just a flat block of blue, and the dark circle next to +1 point has the same problem. Neither looks like the ice cubes and pearls in the actual game, so a subtle label next to each would make them clearer. The instructions are also quite small at 12px, considering how important they are for someone with no game experience to learn how to play, and the white text on the pink Play button only has a 3.4 to 1 contrast ratio, which is under the 4.5 to 1 accessibility minimum.

On Laptop 2, the lives are small 22px hearts in the top right corner, so it’s hard to keep an eye on the cup at the bottom while checking how many are left. On a laptop the game is only played in a column in the middle, about a third of the window, so the hearts end up at the far edge, about 380px outside of it. On Laptop 3, a lost heart disappears completely instead of emptying out, which leaves a gap in the lives box and makes the count even harder to read at a glance. The +1 and “ice!” text are also pale against the light background, at about 2.5 to 1 and 1.7 to 1, so they’re hard to read while everything is moving. A lighter glow fades down from the top of the play area, but it’s cut off in straight lines at both sides, which creates banding that feels unnecessary and isn’t visually pleasing. On Laptop 4, the small x on each ice cube creates an unnecessary visual distraction that doesn’t help the art style.

The table the cup sits on is a tall wooden block with a thinner, lighter rounded rectangle on top, which makes it look like two pieces stacked together and hurts the overall art style. It would feel more natural as one continuous surface. On a laptop it also stops in midair on both sides of the play area, which makes it look unfinished.

On Laptop 6, the spacing on the game over card feels off. The pearls caught label sits far below the score it belongs to and close to the best score instead, and it’s only 12px, while the best score under it is also small at 14px. The AI generated image shows up again here, where it also feels unnecessary, hurts the polish and adds clutter. The Play again button has the same low contrast white text as the Play button.

Issues

On Laptop 2, the tapioca pearls inside the cup overlap its mouth, so the smile is drawn right over the pearls, which looks cluttered and unpolished.

Game Rating: 2/5

Overall the game feels soft and cute, it’s easy to play for someone who’s new to games, and the interface is minimal and easy to understand. However, the unnecessary AI generated images, the unclear rule icons and small instructions, the hard to read lives, the low contrast text and subtle visual distractions like the banding and the x on the ice cubes hurt its art and polish. Together with the pearls overlapping the cup’s mouth and the table that doesn’t look natural, they keep it from a higher score.